Our ability to perceive quality in nature begins, as in art, with the pretty. It expands through successive stages of the beautiful to values as yet uncaptured by language.
Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac
I feel that this watercolor may be finished, though I have yet to sign it. This afternoon I took a long look at it, made some compositional notes in my journal, returned later, and added only what I had suggested in the journal: darkening the ground between the building and Hudson, completing the jutting piece of property to the left of the building, completing foliage in the left background, rendering the shingled roof, applying washes of color to the right of the Hudson, finishing the crepe myrtle tree behind the building. The painting looked much different (and better) to me after those tweakings. Now I’ll lay it aside for a few days or weeks and decide later if anything else needs to be done.
In response to the quote from Leopold (I’m still trying to finish that book that I started reading years ago!), I’m fascinated with nature and what exactly it is that we consider “beautfiul.” As stated in an earlier blog, I myself love to look at gnarled dead trees, the kinks in their branches, and the myriad of limbs that dissolve into the sky. No doubt I did more work on the dead trees to the left rear of the gas station than any other single part of this painting, though I doubt sincerely if viewers will even as much as look at that part, which is alright with me. As a painter, I have never obsessed with what the viewer finds attractive in any of my compositions, so long as the viewer finds the painting worth a second look.
Perhaps tomorrow I can attack the large composition of the Fort Worth Sinclair station I visited yesterday. I had planned on doing that today, but could not obtain some of the supplies needed to start the painting. Hopefully tomorrow.
Thanks for reading.
I paint in order to remember.
I journal because I feel that I am alone.
I blog to remind myself that I am not alone.